< iframe size=" 480" height=" 320" src =" https://www.youtube.com/embed/DN8Z09_uP_Q?rel=0" frameborder=" 0" allowfullscreen >< img design=" float: left; margin:0 5px 5px 0; "src=" http://taxdr.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/y37zyi.jpg"/ > Haumptman v Commisioner of Internal Income-- 831 F. 3d 950 (8th Cir. 2016) is a fascinating situation entailing a deal in compromise on back tax obligations owed to the Internal Revenue Service.
Right here is the link on Google Scholar so you can review it for on your own-- https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14218788548091356663&q=offer+in+compromise+tax&hl=en&as_sdt=40006&as_ylo=2015
This case will certainly discuss the territory (power) of the tax court to hear the appeal as well as probably what NOT to do when attempting to obtain the Internal Revenue Service to approve a deal in concession.
The offer in concession was a doubt regarding collectibility offer in concession-- lump sum paid over 4 months-- for $500,000 on over $15,000,000 in Internal Revenue Service debt.
Not to ruin it however the IRS denied this deal.
Hope you take pleasure in and thanks for viewing!
John
John G. Watts
Watts & Herring, LLC
Representing consumers throughout Alabama
205-879-2447
Home"No depiction is made that the quality of the lawful solutions to be carried out is higher than the quality of legal services executed by other lawyers."