< iframe size=" 480" height=" 320" src =" https://www.youtube.com/embed/DN8Z09_uP_Q?rel=0" frameborder=" 0" allowfullscreen >< img design=" float: left; margin:0 5px 5px 0; "src=" http://taxdr.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/X50KV5.jpg"/ > Haumptman v Commisioner of Internal Earnings-- 831 F. 3d 950 (8th Cir. 2016) is an interesting situation including an offer in compromise on back taxes owed to the Internal Revenue Service.
Here is the web link on Google Scholar so you can read it on your own-- https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14218788548091356663&q=offer+in+compromise+tax&hl=en&as_sdt=40006&as_ylo=2015
This case will certainly talk about the jurisdiction (power) of the tax court to listen to the charm and maybe what NOT to do when attempting to obtain the Internal Revenue Service to accept a deal in concession.
The offer in concession was an uncertainty as to collectibility deal in compromise-- round figure paid over 4 months-- for $500,000 on over $15,000,000 in IRS financial debt.
Not to ruin it yet the IRS denied this deal.
Hope you enjoy and thanks for watching!
John
John G. Watts
Watts & Herring, LLC
Standing for consumers throughout Alabama
205-879-2447
Home"No depiction is made that the high quality of the legal services to be executed is more than the high quality of legal services performed by other legal representatives."